The Department of Police has published proposed amendments to the regulations under the Private Security Industry Regulation Act, inviting public comments. While Action Society supports oversight for ethical and professional security services, we have identified several critical concerns regarding these amendments that could jeopardize public safety and the effectiveness of crime prevention, particularly in relation to gender-based violence (GBV) and will formally relay our concerns in the public participation process.
“The capacity of private security to protect South African communities, particularly in areas where the state is unable to provide adequate safety should be protected at all cost. In many areas neighbourhood watches and private security companies are the only line of defence in gang-ridden areas where communities are left unsupported by formal policing,” says Juanita du Preez, spokesperson of Action Society.
“Instead of centralising control through impractical and punitive regulations, Action Society advocates for decentralising policing powers. Empowering local security entities and fostering a community-driven ecosystem prioritises safety and builds resilience against violence.”
Key Concerns about the regulations:
- Vague firearm and ammunition limitations. Terms like “reasonable quantity” for firearm and ammunition limitations lack clarity, potentially leading to confusion and inconsistent enforcement.
- Suspension or restriction of security firms upon investigation. Under the draft, security firms can be suspended or restricted simply for being under investigation, without any finding of wrongdoing. This undermines legal fairness and opens the door for abuse or political interference, while stripping communities of vital security services.
- Prevention of the use of semi-automatic rifles, prohibiting tactical intervention services. This endangers both security personnel and the public, particularly in high-risk areas plagued by organised crime and GBV
- Adding non-existent tracking devices for firearms. Existing firearm control measures (registers, responsible officers, inspections) already provide adequate oversight if enforced properly.
- Ban on the use of rubber bullets or water cannons for crowd control. Without offering viable alternatives, this cripples the capacity for safe crowd management and protection of public gatherings.
The private security industry plays a vital role in public safety, employing over two million registered personnel – far surpassing the resources of the South African Police Service (SAPS). This industry is crucial in filling gaps in safety and crime prevention, particularly in vulnerable areas.
We urge all South Africans to voice their opposition to these detrimental regulations. Support Action Society in our fight against these perilous provisions that threaten community safety and disrupt the ability of private security to effectively serve our communities here.
Soundbite:
